Objective：Sufficient peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization is important for performing successful autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with lymphoma. However, the optimal mobilization strategy remains a matter of debate in lymphoma.The aim of the study was to explore efficacy and safety of PBSC mobilization using etoposide combined with Cytarabine (EA) plus G-CSF in patients with lymphoma at high-risk of mobilizing failure.
Methods：This retrospective study explored efficacy and safety of PBSC mobilization using EA (etoposide 50~100 mg/m2 , qd d1~3; AraC 0.5 g/m2 , q12h d1~3) plus G-CSF (5 µg/kg/day, from d5 until the day of apheresis) in 81 patients with lymphoma at high-risk of mobilizing failure. As previously reported, patients were defined at high-risk of mobilizing failure if (i) previous collection attempts failed (no special instructions); (ii) previous extensive radiotherapy or a complete course of treatment had affected stem cell activity; or (iii) any of these conditions: advanced disease (2 lines of chemotherapy), refractory disease, extensive bone marrow involvement or cellularity <30% at the time of mobilization or age 65 years.
Results：The mean total and first apheresis trial CD34+ cells collection was 20.37(range 1.08~138.96) and 18.56(range 0.1~138.96)×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Overall, 79(97.5%) patents harvested adequate mobilization (≥2×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg), while 65(80.2%) patients achieved optimal mobilization(≥5×10^6 CD34+ cells/kg). A single apheresis was sufficient to reached the target yield of adequate apheresis in 67(82.7%) patients on median 15th day (range 11~19). We observed acceptable hematological toxicity and exposure of antibiotic usage in 57 patients with a median of 4 days. No severe infections or mobilization-related mortality were observed.
Conclusion：Our resluts suggest that EA plus G-CSF is an effective and safe PBSC mobilization strategy for patients with lymphoma, including those predicted as poor mobilizers. The outcome should be evaluated in a randomized study.
Disclosures
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
